Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Robertson

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1981No. 79-7, SC 27324PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a disciplinary proceeding by the Oregon State Bar charging the Accused with both an improper conflict of interest and an "appearance of impropriety” in his handling of a land sale transaction in which the seller was either a client or former client and the purchaser, who paid the attorney fees for the transaction, was also a client. The answer of the Accused denied both the conflict of interest and appearance of impropriety.

The Trial Board found the Accused not guilty of the first cause of the complaint, which alleged an improper conflict of interest, but guilty of the second cause of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Megdal v. Oregon State Board of Dental ExaminersOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BoivinOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BanksOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of PorterOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  5. In Re Complaint as to Conduct of GaltonOregon Supreme Court · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of WeidnerOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BristowOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of DrakeOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BoyerOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of JansOregon Supreme Court · 1983

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API