Legal Opinion
Sayles v. Peters
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 23, 1936No. Civ. 5317; Civ. 5318PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.
The above actions being founded upon the same circumstances, were consolidated and tried as one, and are here presented upon one transcript and one set of briefs. The plaintiffs in both cases had judgments, from which judgments the defendant A. M. Peters appeals.
Prior to the 3d day of December, 1933, L. H. Peters and A. M. Peters were husband and wife, and residents of Carson. City, Nevada. On the 3d day of December, 1933, L. H. Peters died as a result of the automobile collision hereinafter referred to. The facts set out in the transcript, and as found by the trial court, are as follows:
That…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ferris v. . SterlingNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Commonwealth v. ShermanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
- Broome v. Kern Valley Packing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935
- Perry v. A. Paladini, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1928
- Robertson v. NelsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Baugh v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Wiebe v. SeelyOregon Supreme Court · 1959
- Pfingsten v. WestenhaverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Phipps v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Davidson v. EaleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.