Legal Opinion

Jolly v. McCoy

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 11, 1918No. Civ. No. 1524PublishedCited by 2 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.

The action was for damages for conversion of certain personal property of the alleged value of $1,871. The defendant is the sheriff of the county, and he justified his taking and sale of the property under a writ of execution issued in pursuance of a judgment rendered in the superior court of said county against A. Jolly, the husband of the plaintiff herein.

The claim of appellant was and is that said property sold under said execution was her separate estate, and therefore not liable for the debts of the husband. Plaintiff, her husband, and their son all testified to facts, from which the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Clark v. Tulare Lake Dredging Co.California Court of Appeal · 1910

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Depuy v. ShayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  2. Rivera de Gimenez v. CurranDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API