Legal Opinion
Birkner v. Lam
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 20, 2007No. A116262PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
67 Cal.Rptr.3d 190 (2007)
156 Cal.App.4th 275
Regina BIRKNER et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents,
v.
Kwai Ho LAM, Defendant and Appellant.
No. A116262.
Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division Three.
September 20, 2007.
Stephen Collier, Dean Preston, San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiffs and Respondents.
Andrew M. Zacks, James Brandan Kraus, Zacks Utrecht & Leadbetter, San Francisco, CA, for Defendant and Appellant.
POLLAK, Acting P.J.
Defendant Kwai Ho Lam appeals from the denial of his special motion to strike the complaint of plaintiffs Regina Birkner, Nyri Scanlon, Charles Birkner, and…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking UnlimitedSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Navellier v. SlettenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
- Silberg v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Briggs v. Eden Council for Hope & OpportunityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- 1100 PARK LANE ASSOCIATES v. FeldmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Neville v. CHUDACOFFCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Wallace v. McCubbinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Salma v. CaponCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Cabral v. MartinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.