Legal Opinion
Salma v. Capon
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 9, 2008No. Al 15057PublishedCited by 67 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
STEVENS, J. *
David Salma filed a cross-complaint against Daniel J. Capon which alleged, among other things, causes of action for conversion and intentional interference with prospective economic advantage. Capon filed a special motion to strike these claims pursuant to the anti-SLAPP (strategic lawsuit against public participation) statute, Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16. Before the trial court ruled on Capon’s motion, Salma filed an amended cross-complaint that revised the two claims. Capon filed a second motion to strike the amended claims. The court ultimately struck the…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Korea Supply Co. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.California Supreme Court · 2003
- Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
- Briggs v. Eden Council for Hope & OpportunityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- People v. OchoaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Quelimane Co. v. Stewart Title Guaranty Co.California Supreme Court · 1998
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- Wallace v. McCubbinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Haight Ashbury Free Clinics, Inc. v. Happening House VenturesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Hecimovich v. Encinal School Parent Teacher OrganizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Cabral v. MartinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Graham-Sult v. ClainosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.