Legal Opinion

State v. Miller

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 27, 2006No. 03CR0968; A127389PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.

The state petitions for reconsideration of our decision in State v. Miller, 208 Or App 424, 144 P3d 1052 (2006), in which we held that the trial court properly denied the state’s motion in limine to admit into evidence certain lab reports without offering testimony by the authors of those reports. The state asserts that it wishes to “correct the court’s understanding of the proceedings in the trial court.” The state further asserts that, once this court has removed its “erroneous references,” it will need to modify the disposition of the case and reverse the trial court’s order. As explained…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. SwainOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  2. State v. HancockOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. JacobsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. MarroquinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  2. State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  3. State v. ChoinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  4. State v. WillisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  5. State v. DibbernCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API