Legal Opinion
State v. Hancock
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided July 1, 1993No. CC 900714; CA A65081; SC S39185PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*7PETERSON, J.
The question in this case is whether defendant’s state and federal confrontation rights were violated by the admission of a laboratory report pursuant to ORS 475.235. That statute provides in part:
“(3) In all prosecutions under ORS 475.005 to 475.375 and 475.805 to 475.999 involving the analysis of a controlled substance or sample thereof, a certified copy of the analytical report signed by the director of the state police crime detection laboratory or the criminalist conducting the analysis shall be accepted as prima facie evidence of the results of the analytical findings.
“(4)…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Douglas v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- White v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. InadiSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Sterling v. CuppOregon Supreme Court · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- State v. CaulfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. FosterWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. BirchfieldOregon Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2005
- State v. SnyderOregon Supreme Court · 2004
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.