Legal Opinion
State v. Willis
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided August 5, 2009No. CFH060180; A134794PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBarron, J.
pro tempore
Defendant appeals her conviction for possession of methamphetamine after a jury trial. She argues that the admission, over her objection, of an Oregon State Police crime laboratory report without producing the author of the report violated her right to confront and cross-examine witnesses under the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article I, section 11, of the Oregon Constitution. 1 We affirm.
The following facts are supported by evidence in the record. See State v. Ehly, 317 Or 66, 74-75, 854 P2d 421 (1993); State v. Silva, 170 Or App 440, 442, 13 P3d 143…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. WillisOregon Supreme Court · 2010
- Commonwealth v. VasquezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
- Commonwealth v. VasquezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010