Legal Opinion

State v. Jacobs

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 27, 2005No. 0012-39506; A118804PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction and sentence for two felony and two misdemeanor crimes. The sentence for one of the felonies — unlawful use of a weapon, ORS 166.220 — included a durational departure to a prison term of 36 months, even though the trial court originally had announced that it was going to impose a sentence on that charge of 18 months, without a durational departure. Defendant argues that the sentence imposed in the written judgment is invalid because he was not present when it was pronounced, that the court lacked the authority to modify the proposed sentence because…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. State v. SwainOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  3. State v. DeCampCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  4. DeAngelo v. SchiedlerOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State Ex Rel. O'Leary v. JacobsOregon Supreme Court · 1983

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. FrenchCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  2. State v. HornerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  3. State v. ZolotoffCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  4. State v. HillmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  5. State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API