Legal Opinion

State v. Davis

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 28, 2007No. 040748506; A126406PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, J.

Defendant appeals from a conviction for misdemeanor driving while suspended. ORS 811.182. On appeal, she assigns error to the trial court’s decision to admit into evidence two documents, together known as a “suspension packet,” prepared by the Oregon Department of Transportation, Driver and Motor Vehicle Services Division (DMV). According to defendant, admitting the documents violated her constitutional right to confront the witnesses against her. We hold that one of the documents, a printout of defendant’s driving record, was admissible because it was not “testimonial.” As to the other…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Palmer v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. State Ex Rel. Gladden v. LonerganOregon Supreme Court · 1954
  5. State v. NormanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. ShipleySupreme Court of Iowa · 2008
  2. People v. EspinozaColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. State v. DukesCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2008
  4. State v. VelykoretskykhCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  5. State v. LeibelNebraska Supreme Court · 2013

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API