Legal Opinion

State v. Choin

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 5, 2008No. CF040926; A130734PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, P. J.

Defendant was convicted of attempted delivery of a Schedule II controlled substance within 1,000 feet of a school, ORS 161.405 and former ORS 475.999 (2003), renumbered as ORS 475.904 (2005); possession of a Schedule II controlled substance, former ORS 475.992 (2003), renumbered as ORS 475.840 (2005); felon in possession of a firearm, ORS 166.270; and unlawful possession of a firearm, ORS 166.250. On appeal, defendant asserts two assignments of error. First, defendant contends that the trial court erred in allowing the testimony of an officer whose identity had not been disclosed on the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. RamirezOregon Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. BirchfieldOregon Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. HancockOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. MarroquinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. DanielCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  2. State v. Ascencio-GalindoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  3. State v. WillisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  4. State v. NewsomeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  5. State v. Gomez-BeizaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API