Legal Opinion
Dalles Irrigation District v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided June 27, 2008No. 05-1042CPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LETTOW, Judge.
This ease addresses charges for what is commonly known as “reserved power” supplied to an irrigation district in Oregon. Such power is provided at preferential rates mandated by statute, and the disputed issues concern the nature and scope of the preference arising with the particular statute applicable to the pertinent irrigation project.
A contract between The Dalles Irrigation District (“The Dalles” or “District”) and the United States Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation (“Bureau”), calls upon the Bureau to provide the District with power for…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Dalles Irrigation District v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Pennsauken Senior Towers Urban Renewal Associates, LLC. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Kenneth Earman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Tektel, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Dalles Irrigation District v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.