Legal Opinion
Pennsauken Senior Towers Urban Renewal Associates, LLC. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided September 18, 2008No. Nos. 07-174C, 07-646CPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
CHARLES F. LETTOW, Judge.
Plaintiffs have contracts with the United States, acting through the Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”), under the “Section 8” housing program. Plaintiffs Haddon Housing Associates, LLC, and the Housing Authority of the Township of Haddon, New Jersey (collectively referred to as “Haddon”), filed a complaint on September 4, 2007, against the United States for breach of a Housing Assistance Payments Contract (“HAP Contract”).1 Haddon sought damages based on the alleged failure of HUD to provide automatic annual rent increases under the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Christensen v. Harris CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Barnhart v. WaltonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Tcherepnin v. KnightSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- John R. Sand & Gravel Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Haddon Housing Associates, Ltd. Partnership v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Haddon Housing Associates, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Haddon Housing Associates, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Park Properties Associates, L.P. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Ocean View Towers Associates, Ltd. Partnership v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.