Legal Opinion

Kenneth Earman v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided December 12, 2013No. 10-617CPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BUSH, Senior Judge.

Now pending before the court are defendant’s motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (RCFC), and the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment pursuant to RCFC 56. These motions have been fully briefed. Oral argument was held on October 31, 2013. For the reasons described below, the court grants defendant’s motion to dismiss and motion for summary judgment, and denies plaintiffs cross-motion for summary judgment.

BACKGROUND 1

The Conservation Security Program (the CSP or the Program) is a federal…

2Cases cited71 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Land of Lincoln Mutual Health Insurance Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  2. Dobyns v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  3. Public Housing Authorities Directors Association v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
  4. James M. Fogg Farms, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
  5. Public Housing Authorities Directors Association v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API