Legal Opinion
Lenihan v. Boeing Co.
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided January 14, 1998No. CIV.A. H-96-1589PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CRONE, United States Magistrate Judge.
Pending before the court is Defendant The Boeing Company’s (“Boeing”) Motion for Summary Judgment (# 35). Having reviewed the pending motion, the submissions of the parties, the pleadings, and the applicable law, this court is of the opinion that Boeing’s motion for summary judgment should be granted in part and denied in part.
I. Background
Plaintiff Karen A Lenihan (“Lenihan”) began working for Boeing in September 1978 in Wichita, Kansas. She was terminated from the company in November 1984 for excessive absenteeism. Subsequently, she…
2Cases cited161 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Paul W. Douglass v. United Services Automobile AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
156 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Broussard v. Oryx Energy Co.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2000
- Wojciechowski v. National Oilwell Varco, L.P.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2011
- Sivertson v. Citibank, N.A.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2019
- Thomas v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Harris v. Auxilium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.