Wojciechowski v. National Oilwell Varco, L.P.
District Court, S.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JANIS GRAHAM JACK, District Judge.
Pending before the Court are Defendant National Oilwell Varco’s Motion for Summary Judgment (D.E. 29) and Defendant’s Motion to Strike Plaintiff Sarina Wojciechowski’s Summary Judgment Evidence. (D.E. 33.) For the reasons set forth below, Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (D.E. 29) is DENIED IN PART and GRANTED IN PART, as detailed herein. Defendant’s Motion to Strike (D.E. 33) is DENIED in PART and GRANTED IN PART, as detailed herein.
I. JURISDICTION
This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action because Plaintiff brings claims under…
2Cases cited59 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Carole Tomka v. The Seiler Corporation, Daniel Lucey, David Polonsky and Timothy ConroyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Lee v. Metrocare ServicesDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2013
- Brooks v. Firestone Polymers, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2014
- Hernandez v. City of Corpus ChristiDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2011
- Addison v. Louisiana Regional Landfill CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2023
- Celious v. Worley LimitedDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2025
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.