Thomas v. United States

OPINION

BUSH, Judge.

This case is before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment under Rule 56 of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (RCFC). These motions have been thoroughly briefed, and oral argument was neither requested by the parties nor deemed necessary by the court.2 Plaintiff has ably and clearly articulated arguments proposing summary judgment in her favor and resisting summary judgment for *635the government. Nonetheless, for the reasons set forth below, the court grants defendant’s motion and must dismiss plaintiff’s claims.

BACKGROUND

Ms. Ann Thomas works as…