Legal Opinion
Harris v. Auxilium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided September 28, 2009No. Civil Action 4:07-cv-3938PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
KEITH P. ELLISON, District Judge.
Before the Court are Plaintiffs’ Motion to Certify Class (Doc. No. 54), Defendant’s Motion to Extend Time to Respond to Plaintiffs Motion to Certify Class (Doc. No. 55), Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 76), Motion to Strike Plaintiffs’ Summary Judgment Evidence and for Sanctions (Doc. No. 85), and Defendant’s Motion to Exceed Reply Page Limit (Doc. No. 87). After considering the parties’ filings and the applicable law, the Court finds that Defendant’s Motion to Strike and for Sanctions should be granted in part and denied…
2Cases cited92 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Little v. Liquid Air Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Orchestratehr, Inc. v. TrombettaDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2016
- Hernandez v. City of Corpus ChristiDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2011
- Better Bags, Inc. v. Illinois Tool Works, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2013
- Almond v. UNIFIED SCHOOL DIST. NO. 501District Court, D. Kansas · 2010
- Gutierrez v. City of Converse And Its Fire DepartmentDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2020