Legal Opinion

Amatuzio v. Gandalf Systems Corp.

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided February 4, 1998No. Civil Action 95-4808(JEI), 96-621(JEI)PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED OPINION

IRENAS, District Judge.

This matter comes before this Court on defendants Gandalf Systems Corp. and Gandalf Technologies, Inc.’s motion for summary judgment as to all claims in this action, and plaintiffs’ cross-motion for summary judgment as to all claims. The disputes in this action arise out of a severance pay plan covered by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), and defendants’ obligation under the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act (‘WARN”), to give affected employees notice of a mass layoff and/or plant closing. This Court has jurisdiction…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Allen v. Sybase, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  2. Hooven v. Exxon Mobil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
  3. Abbott v. Schnader, Harrison, Segal & Lewis, LLPSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Austen v. Catterton Partners V, LPDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2010
  5. Benham v. Lenox Savings BankDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API