Legal Opinion
Allen v. Sybase, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided October 25, 2006No. 04-4045PublishedCited by 122 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs, twenty-six1 former employees of Financial Fusion, Inc. (FFI), filed suit against FFI and its parent company, Sy-base, Inc., (Sybase) (defendants), for violations under the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act (WARN). 29 U.S.C. § 2101 et seq. The parties filed cross motions for summary judgment, and the district court ruled for plaintiffs. The court subsequently entered final judgment ordering defendant companies to pay damages, interest and attorneys fees to plaintiffs in accordance with WARN. Defendants appeal. We affirm in part, reverse in…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Ocelot Oil Corporation v. Sparrow IndustriesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Jerome Grimes v. City and County of San Francisco, Defendant-Cross-Defendant-Appellee, and Nathan Johnson, Defendant-Cross-Claimant-Appellant. Jerome Grimes v. City and County of San Francisco, Defendant-Cross-Defendant-Appellant, and Nathan Johnson, Defendant-Cross-Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by122 opinions
- Schur v. L.A. Weight Loss Centers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- Been v. O.K. Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Sanderson v. Wyoming Highway PatrolCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. GallantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Taylor v. Progress Energy, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007
117 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.