Legal Opinion
Benham v. Lenox Savings Bank
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided October 13, 1998No. CIV.A. 98-30004-MAPPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
PONSOR, District Judge.
Upon de novo review, this Report and Recommendation is adopted; plaintiffs motion is hereby denied.
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Docket No. 10)
NEIMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
In her motion for partial summary judgment, Jacqueline T. Benham (“Plaintiff’) asserts that Lenox Savings Bank (“Defendant”) committed various violations of the Employee Retirement income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. (“ERISA”). In addition, Plaintiff claims that Defendant fraudulently induced her to enter into a…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. Emiliano Valencia-CopeteCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- McCarthy v. Commerce Group, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2011
- Abbott v. Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County2001