Harrison v. Glucose Sugar Refining Co.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois. On August 14, 1897, the appellant, Lee S. Harrison, entered into a written agreement with the appellee as follows:' “This agreement, made at Chicago, Illinois, on this 14th day of August A. D. 1897, by and between Lee Harrison, of Peoria, the first party hereto, and the Glucose Sugar Refining Company, a corporation organized under the laws of the state of New Jersey, the second party…
Read the full summary
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois. On August 14, 1897, the appellant, Lee S. Harrison, entered into a written agreement with the appellee as follows:' “This agreement, made at Chicago, Illinois, on this 14th day of August A. D. 1897, by and between Lee Harrison, of Peoria, the first party hereto, and the Glucose Sugar Refining Company, a corporation organized under the laws of the state of New Jersey, the second party hereto, witnesseth: Whereas, the first party has been for several years last past engaged in the business of manufacturing…
1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts). The objection that the appellee is an illegal trust or monopoly condemned by the law of the state of Illinois, and so declared by the supreme court of that state, cannot be 'sustained. We have held in the case of an injurious combination of the nature here asserted that the remedy is by direct proceedings; that with respect to a contract which is independent of the illegal combination, and is merely incident to other and innocent purposes, one who voluntarily and knowingly deal's with parties so combined cannot on the one hand take the benefit of his bargain, and on…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Connolly v. Union Sewer Pipe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Diamond Match Co. v. . RoeberNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Gibbs v. Consolidated Gas Co. of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Oregon Steam Navigation Co. v. WinsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Peabody v. NorfolkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Lektro-Vend Corp. v. Vendo Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
- AO Smith Corporation v. Petroleum Iron Works Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1934
- Texas Co. v. Central Fuel Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912
- May v. YoungSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
- Jenkins v. KingIndiana Supreme Court · 1946
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.