Legal Opinion

Freudenthal v. Espey

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 15, 1909No. 6390PublishedCited by 36 opinions

Error to Las Animas District Court—Hon. M. S. Bailey, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice White

The parties to this record are physicians. The defendant in error instituted a suit in the lower court, and will hereinafter be called plaintiff, against the plaintiff in error, who will hereinafter be called the defendant, for an injunction to restrain the latter from practicing his profession in the city of Trinidad in violation of a restrictive covenant in a written con-* tract between the two.

The complaint, after stating the professional character of the parties, and that plaintiff had long *490been a practitioner in that community, had a large and extensive practice, and needed an assistant,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rakestraw v. LanierSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  2. Philadelphia Ball Club, Ltd. v. LajoieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
  3. Linn v. SigsbeeIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Ryan v. HamiltonIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Beatty v. CobleIndiana Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Marsh USA Inc. v. CookTexas Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Willman v. BehelerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1973
  3. United States v. American Medical Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
  4. Foltz v. StruxnessSupreme Court of Kansas · 1950
  5. Styles v. LyonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1913

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API