Legal Opinion

Friends of Polk County v. Oliver

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 28, 2011No. 09P10349; A144372PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSercombe, J.

Petitioners Friends of Polk County and Gloria Bennett (petitioners) appeal a writ of review judgment. The judgment modified a decision of a Polk County hearings officer that determined that claimant Martinson (claimant) had a vested right to develop a 30-acre portion of a 137-acre tract under section 5(3) of Ballot Measure 49 (2007), but did not have a vested right to develop the entire tract. The circuit court concluded that claimant had a right under section 5(3) to develop not only the 30-acre subarea for commercial uses but also the entire tract for commercial and residential uses.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Clackamas County v. HolmesOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Friends of Yamhill County, Inc. v. Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  3. Biggerstaff v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  4. Kleikamp v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  5. Union Oil Co. v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Or. Shores Conservation Coal. v. Bd. of Commissioners of Clatsop Cnty.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  2. Friends of Yamhill Cnty. v. Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners of Yamhill Cnty.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  3. Campbell v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  4. Kraai v. Bureau of Fire & Police Disability & Retirement FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  5. STATE EX REL. DLCD v. Linn CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API