Legal Opinion

Biggerstaff v. Board of County Commissioners

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 29, 2010No. CV080224; A140978PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.

Petitioners appeal the circuit court’s judgment in a writ of review proceeding that affirmed the county’s determination that respondents Ralph E. and Norma J. Johnson (the Johnsons) have a vested right to complete development of a 41-lot residential subdivision in compliance with county and state waivers issued pursuant to Ballot Measure 37 (2004). On appeal, petitioners contend that the reviewing court misconstrued the applicable law in sustaining the vesting officer’s determination that the Johnsons have a vested right to complete that development because the Johnsons’ expenditures were not…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Outdoor Media Dimensions Inc. v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Clackamas County v. HolmesOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Friends of Yamhill County, Inc. v. Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  4. Kleikamp v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  5. Bleeg v. MetroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State v. BertschCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  2. Plotkin v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  3. State v. KolbCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  4. Kleikamp v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  5. State v. Crook CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API