Legal Opinion

Campbell v. Clackamas County

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 29, 2011No. CV07120049 and CV07120048 A139641 (Control) and A139642PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSercombe, P. J.

This case concerns whether plaintiffs’ rights to develop a residential subdivision had vested under Measure 49. In 1969, plaintiffs acquired a 62-acre tract of land in rural Clackamas County. At that time, the property’s zoning allowed residences to be built on one-acre parcels. More restrictive zoning was subsequently applied that confined the uses of the property to agricultural and forestry uses. Pursuant to Measure 37, former ORS 197.352(8) (2005), amended by Or Laws 2007, chapter 424, section 4, renumbered as ORS 195.305 (2007), plaintiffs obtained county and state waivers of the land…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Clackamas County v. HolmesOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Friends of Yamhill County, Inc. v. Board of CommissionersOregon Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Friends of Yamhill County, Inc. v. Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  4. Cyrus v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF DESCHUTESCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  5. Kleikamp v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Friends of Yamhill Cnty. v. Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners of Yamhill Cnty.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  2. Oregon Shores Conservation v. Bd. of CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API