Friends of Yamhill Cnty. v. Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners of Yamhill Cnty.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.
*243Carr and Jeanne Biggerstaff, Friends of Yamhill County (FOYC), and the State of Oregon (jointly, appellants) appeal a judgment entered in a writ-of-review proceeding that affirmed Yamhill County's determination that Ralph and Norma Johnson (claimants) have a vested right under section 5(3) of Ballot Measure 49 (2007) to complete a 41-lot subdivision on their property.1 Appellants *551contend, among other things, that the writ-of-review court erred in affirming the county's determination that claimants had a vested right to complete the subdivision. For the reasons explained below, we agree.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- Nelson v. Emerald People's Utility DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Clackamas County v. HolmesOregon Supreme Court · 1973
- Friends of Yamhill County, Inc. v. Board of CommissionersOregon Supreme Court · 2011
- Friends of Yamhill County, Inc. v. Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kleikamp v. Board of Commissioners of Yamhill CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
- Moore v. City of EugeneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
- State v. Yamhill Cnty.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2019