State v. Aguilar
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NORRIS, Judge.
¶ 1 Although at the beginning of trial, the superior court admonished the jury to “not consult any source, such as ... the [Ijnternet for information,” and then reminded the jury to observe the admonition throughout the trial, two jurors conducted Internet research on the legal definitions of terms in the court’s final instructions, communicated their research to other jurors, and three additional jurors considered the research before joining the other jurors in unanimously convicting Jesus Valdez Aguilar and eodefendant Francisco Ibarra Norzagaray (collectively, “Appel…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Patrick James Jeffries v. Tana Wood, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- State v. ChappleArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- Harry M. Sassounian v. Earnest Roe, Warden of Lancaster Attorney General of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Kennebrew v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
- State v. ThompsonArizona Supreme Court · 2003
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
- State of Arizona v. Robert Charles GlissendorfCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
- State v. FellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
- American Power Products, Inc. v. CSK Auto, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- State v. MekeelCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.