American Power Products, Inc. v. CSK Auto, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NORRIS, Judge:
¶ 1 The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether the superior court should have denied Appellant American Power Products, Ine.’s motion for a new trial without first holding an evidentiary hearing to determine whether an ex parte communication between the bailiff and the jury was improper and prejudicial. Because the court did not have the necessary facts to decide the effect of the communication on the jury, it should not have ruled on American’s motion without first holding such a hearing. Accordingly, we remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
FAC…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Rogers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- State v. HallArizona Supreme Court · 2003
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Charles H. KEATING, Jr., Charles H. Keating, III, Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Haley v. Blue Ridge Transfer Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
- Perkins v. KomarnyckyjArizona Supreme Court · 1992
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- American Power Products, Inc. v. CSK Auto, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 2016
- Broadband v. SatcomCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018