State v. Thompson
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ORDER
TIMMER, Judge.
¶ 1 Counsel for the appellant has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and State v. Clark, 196 Ariz. 530, 2 P.3d 89 (App.1999), advising that after a search of the record, he has not found any issue that is not frivolous. At defendant Tina Marie Thompson’s request, counsel asks this court to review 14 issues; with our authorization, Thompson also filed a supple*45mental brief in propria persona (“pro per”) seeking reversal for many reasons. From our review of the issues raised or apparent in the briefs, we…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Penson v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- McCoy v. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, District 1Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- State v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
- State v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- State v. BoydCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
- State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
- State v. ChavezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
- State v. FenderCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.