Legal Opinion

State v. Thompson

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 16, 2012No. 1 CA-CR 11-0424PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ORDER

TIMMER, Judge.

¶ 1 Counsel for the appellant has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and State v. Clark, 196 Ariz. 530, 2 P.3d 89 (App.1999), advising that after a search of the record, he has not found any issue that is not frivolous. At defendant Tina Marie Thompson’s request, counsel asks this court to review 14 issues; with our authorization, Thompson also filed a supple*45mental brief in propria persona (“pro per”) seeking reversal for many reasons. From our review of the issues raised or apparent in the briefs, we…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Penson v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. McCoy v. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, District 1Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. State v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  5. State v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  2. State v. BoydCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
  3. State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
  4. State v. ChavezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
  5. State v. FenderCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API