Legal Opinion

State v. Fell

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided April 4, 2017No. 2 CA-SA 2017-0013PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ECKERSTROM, Chief Judge:

¶ 1 In this special action, the State of Arizona seeks relief from the respondent judge’s order precluding recordings of jail telephone calls and visits involving the real party in interest, defendant Bryan Lietzau, and the judge’s order precluding a transcript purportedly showing text messages between Lietzau and the minor victim. Because the state has not asserted it would have presented any precluded recordings at trial absent the respondent’s order, we decline to accept jurisdiction to consider that issue. However, because the respondent erred by concluding…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. KochSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. State v. LaversArizona Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Commonwealth, Aplt v. Koch, A.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. State of Arizona v. Shawna FordeArizona Supreme Court · 2014
  5. State v. Haight-GyuroCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. GriffithCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
  2. State v. Rogel TorresCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
  3. Walkenbach v. Hon. hopkins/stateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API