Legal Opinion

Schumann-Heink & Co. v. United States National Bank

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 11, 1930No. Docket No. 140PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAINES, J., pro tem.

This is a civil action growing out of the same state of facts involved in People v. Schumann-Heink, 98 Cal. App. 225 [276 Pac. 625], and in People v. Schumann-Heink, 106 Cal. App. 81 [288 Pac. 838]. Appellant Schumann-Heink and Co., Inc., was a corporation engaged in buying and selling securities and general brokerage. Henry Schumann-Heink was its president, spending his time largely in and out of its Los Angeles office. One Clare was its secretary and treasurer and in charge of its San Diego office. Schumann-Heink and Clare were both directors. Pursuant to a discussion…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. National Safe Deposit, Sav. & Trust Co. of DC v. HibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Knox v. Eden Musee Americain Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1896
  3. Wenban Estate, Inc. v. HewlettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Frey v. CliffordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Smitton v. McCulloughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Fairbanks v. Crump Irrigation & Supply Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930
  2. Bacon v. KesselCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  3. Anglo California National Bank v. Far West Lumber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. Damerel v. North American Bond & Mortgage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
  5. Meldrim v. DoyleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API