Legal Opinion

Meldrim v. Doyle

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 27, 1932No. Docket No. 8295Published

1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.

The defendant R. M. Doyle appeals from a judgment in an action to quiet title to real property arising out of the following facts, which are not disputed:

In March, 1928, George Hurley gave Doyle a mortgage on certain personal property to secure the payment of rent thereafter to accrue. In August, 1928, David Carr obtained possession of the mortgaged property and exchanged it with J. E. Gruben for three lots, the title to. which is the subject of this action. On September 12, 1928, Carr conveyed the lots to the plaintiff G. D. Meldrim, the deed therefor being recorded on September 26, 1928.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smitton v. McCulloughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Kemp v. EnemarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Schumann-Heink & Co. v. United States National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. Conway v. FunkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API