Legal Opinion

National Safe Deposit, Sav. & Trust Co. of DC v. Hibbs

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 10, 1913No. 79PublishedCited by 115 opinions

ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. The facts, which involve the question of liability of a broker for sale of stolen stock certificates, are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Day

This case is in this court upon writ of error to the judgment of the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia, 32 App. D. C. 459, affirming the judgment of the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia; in an action brought by the plaintiff in error, hereinafter called the Bank, against the defendant in error for the alleged conversion of certain shares of stock. The case was tried upon an agreed statement of facts, from which it appears:

The plaintiff in error has been doing a general banking business in the City of Washington, including the making of loans to its customers on promissory…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bank v. LanierSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. Knox v. Eden Musee Americain Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1896

3Cited by115 opinions

  1. Pettis v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Hammelburger v. Foursome Inn Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Empire Trust Co. v. CahanSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  4. Robbins v. Pacific Eastern Corp.California Supreme Court · 1937
  5. People's Trust Co. v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1915

110 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API