Legal Opinion

Gay v. Havermale

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 1903No. 3866PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Spokane County. — Hon. William E. Eichardsoit, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Oh Eehearihg.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Reavis, C. J.

Plaintiff and cross complainants and respondents each having filed petitions for rehearing in this cause, it was again fully argued, both orally and upon briefs. Counsel for appellants urge that the cause must be considered alone upon their exceptions. The allusion in the former opinion (27 Wash. 390, 67 Pac. 804) to matters appearing in the transcript was merely intended to fully illustrate the case. It is an equitable action. As ob-. served in the former opinion, the record does not contain any of the evidence. Thus no…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Allend v. Spokane Falls & Northern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Mullan's Adm'r v. CarperWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Kuhn v. MasonWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Stearns v. HochbrunnWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Chezum v. McBrideWashington Supreme Court · 1899

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gould v. AustinWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Davis v. RogersWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Ferrell v. LordWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Little Bill v. SwansonWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Kline v. GallandWashington Supreme Court · 1909

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API