Legal Opinion
Gould v. Austin
Washington Supreme Court
Decided April 7, 1909No. 7651PublishedCited by 26 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court, for King county, Morris, J., entered February 29, 1908, upon findings in favor of the defendant, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action to quiet title.
1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.
The appellants sued the respondent to quiet title to real property. Issue was taken on the complaint, and a trial was had on January 8, 1908, the minutes of which the clerk recorded in his journal in the following language:
“This cause comes on regularly for hearing this day, Plaintiff appearing in person and by counsel H. H. Eaton, F. P. Christenson and A. C. McDonald, Esqs.
“Defendant appearing in person and by counsel Messrs. McCafferty & Godfrey and S. V. Carey, Esq.
“Defendant’s motion for judgment on pleadings is denied. Exception allowed.
“Plaintiffs’ exhibits ‘A’ and ‘B’, Two deeds, and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State ex rel. Orr v. FawcettWashington Supreme Court · 1897
- Enos v. WilcoxWashington Supreme Court · 1891
- State ex rel. Jensen v. BellWashington Supreme Court · 1904
- Gay v. HavermaleWashington Supreme Court · 1903
3Cited by26 opinions
- Katterhagen v. MeisterWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- McFadden v. McFaddenArizona Supreme Court · 1921
- Harbican v. ChamberlinWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Moss v. MossWashington Supreme Court · 1931
- Clambey v. CoplandWashington Supreme Court · 1909
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.