Little Bill v. Swanson
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Clifford, J., entered April 20, 1910, upon findings in favor of the defendants, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action of ejectment.
1Opinion of the CourtCuow, J.
This action was originally commenced by Little Bill or Maquiqui, against John Swanson, Hilma Swanson, his wife, Anton Nelson, Bertha Nelson, Kis wife, Gustaf Peterson, Anna Peterson, his wife, Elizabeth Spott Sahms, Willie *652Sahms, her husband, George Spott, and Edwin EeUs', as guardian of George Spott, a minor, to recover twenty acres of land in Pierce county. From a judgment in favor of the defendants Swanson, Nelson, and Peterson, the plaintiff has appealed.
There is no material dispute as to the facts. On the evidence we conclude the findings made and entered by the trial judge must be…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Galliher v. CadwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Marquez v. FrisbieSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Felix v. PatrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Penn Mutual Life Insurance v. AustinSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- McKay v. KalytonSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- McKnight v. BasilidesWashington Supreme Court · 1943
- Farrar v. HoodNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1952
- Jacobs v. PrichardSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Crosbie v. PartridgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Daly v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.