Legal Opinion

Chezum v. McBride

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1899No. 3245PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Pierce County. — Hon. James A. Williamson, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Tlie opinion of the court was delivered by

Gordon, C. J.

This action was commenced in 1896 . for the purpose of quieting title to certain premises in the city of Tacoma. Numerous parties were made defendants, but the respondent, Ogden Bolton, was the only answering defendant, and this controversy is limited to the particular premises claimed by him.

*559The premises in controversy are a part of the S. S. Hilton pre-emption claim, located in sections 8 and 9, township 20 north, range 3 east of the Willamette meridian, in Pierce county, and were patented to the said Hilton in September, 1869. The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brown v. County of Buena VistaSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Richards v. MacKallSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. Mullan's Adm'r v. CarperWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Parker v. DacresSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  5. Bryant v. GrovesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1896

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Just v. Idaho Canal & Improvement Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Baxter v. National Mortgage Loan Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Waldrip v. Olympia Oyster Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Teratron General v. Institutional Investors TrustCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977
  5. Mosbrucker v. Greenfield Implement, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API