Legal Opinion

Robinet v. Hawks

California Supreme Court

Decided January 18, 1927No. Docket No. Sac. 3765PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.

Defendants are farmers and owners of a team and wagon driven by plaintiff on defendants’ ranch. Plaintiff was employed as a teamster collecting boxes of fruit, and was injured by being thrown off the wagon he was driving, along with the load of fruit thereon, for which injuries so sustained he sought judgment against defendants from the court sitting with a jury and charging defendants with negligence in and about the matters alleged in the complaint.

Defendants denied negligence and pleaded that the injuries received by plaintiff were solely the result of his own negligence. Upon the issues…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Pierce v. United Gas and Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Starr v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Perry v. Angelus Hospital AssociationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Silveira v. IversonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Paraffine Paint Co.California Supreme Court · 1922

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Anthony v. HobbieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Neel v. Mannings, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Sheward v. VirtueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. McDonald v. Foster Memorial HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. Traylen v. CitraroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API