Perry v. Angelus Hospital Association
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
The plaintiff, May Perry, was employed by the defendant to operate an ironing-machine, commonly called a "mangle," in the laundry of the hospital conducted by the defendant. The action is for personal injuries sustained by her while so engaged. She being a married woman, her husband is made a nominal party plaintiff. There was a trial by jury, a verdict being given for plaintiff for eleven thousand five hundred dollars, for which amount the court entered judgment. The defendant appeals from the judgment, and from an order denying its motion for a new trial.
The mangle operated by plaintiff…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hale v. San Bernardino Valley Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
- Crabbe v. Mammoth Channel Gold Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
- Illinois Trust & Savings Bank v. Pacific Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
- Roche v. Llewellyn Iron Works Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
- Alexander v. Central Lumber & Mill Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Neel v. Mannings, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1942
- May v. FarrellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Sim v. WeeksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Fonseca v. County of OrangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Hoffman v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1927
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.