Legal Opinion

Martin v. Follis

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 25, 1928No. 18563PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHefner, J.

Zella Follis, the defendant in error, as plaintiff, brought this suit in the district court of Ottawa county against Sam Martin and the United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, as defendants, to recover damages sustained by the plaintiff through the alleged negligent acts of the defendant Sam Martin while acting in his official capacity as special highway officer of Ottawa county. The United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company was joined as defendant as the surety on his official bond.

The case.- was tried .• to- a jury, and the: plaintiff1 recovered damages in the sum of $2,000 against both…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kansas City Southern Ry. Co. v. WallaceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Dies v. Bank of Commerce of SapulpaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  3. Ferguson v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pawnee County, Excise Board v. KurnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  2. Excise Bd. of Ottawa County v. St. Louis-S. F. R.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  3. Protest of Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  4. Protest of Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API