Legal Opinion · Dissent

Protest of Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 13, 1933No. 23887Published

1Dissent

BUSBY, X

(dissenting). I dissent from that portion of the majority opinion constrains: section 4, chapter 194, Session Lawrs 1923 [O. S. 1931, see. 10319], and in effect holding void $28,184.67 in warrants issued under the terms of that act for police patrol and equipment authorized by the board of county commissioners. This appears to be the sum issued in warrants for this purpose before the protests were filed. On September 25, 1928, this court held the act, supra, constitutional and announced the following principles of law in connection therewith: Syllabus parags. 2, 3, 4, and 5, Martin et…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Martin v. FollisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API