Protest of Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtAndrews, J.
This is an appeal by both the protestant and the protestee from a judgment of the Court of Tax Review sustaining the protest of the plaintiff in error as to some of the items protested and denyüi" i's pi-ote«t as to some of the Perns protested. The items protested weve for the íiscnl vp.lr comme^cirg July 1, 1931. Here inafter the parties will be referred to as protestant and protestee.
The protestant contends that there was error in denying its protest as to an item of $50,000 which was appropriated for additions and betterments to the Dunbar school building, a part of the separate school…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- In Re Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- El Reno Wholesale Grocery Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Board of Com'rs of Oklahoma County v. RyanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Prince Co. v. St. Louis & S. F. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Protest of First Nat. Bank of GuthrieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Board of Education of Oklahoma City v. CloudmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Lowden v. Oklahoma County, Excise BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- Kay County, Excise Board v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Excise BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- State Ex Rel. Murphy v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.