Legal Opinion
Pawnee County, Excise Board v. Kurn
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 16, 1940No. 29684PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WELCH, V. C. J.
The taxing officials of Pawnee county refused to apply any portion of the moneys received by the county as its distributive share of vehicle license tax toward financing the sinking fund accruals on its road bonds for the fiscal year 1939-40. The result was a greater ad valorem tax levy on protestant’s property than would have resulted otherwise.
In justification of their action, the county here urges that the provisions of article 7, chapter 50, S. L. 1937, and article 7, chapter 50, S. L. 1939, which require that a portion of such funds be used for the above-mentioned purpose,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Amos v. MathewsSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
- Thurston, County Treasurer v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Carlton v. MathewsSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
- Dies v. Bank of Commerce of SapulpaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Wallace v. GassawaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- A.E. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- Wimberly v. DeaconSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- Way v. Grand Lake Ass'n, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
- Board of Comr's v. ShawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
- School Dist. No. 25 v. HodgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.