State v. Thackaberry
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtLinder, J.
Defendant appeals his conviction for driving under the influence of intoxicants (DUII). See ORS 813.010. In his original brief to this court, he assigned error to the trial court’s refusal to give a proposed jury instruction. After the state filed its respondent’s brief, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Crawford v. Washington,_US _, 124 S Ct 1354, 158 L Ed 2d 177 (2004). In light of that decision, defendant moved for leave to file a supplemental brief raising a further claim of error under Crawford. We granted the motion and also gave the state leave to respond to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. JuryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- State v. HancockOregon Supreme Court · 1993
3Cited by25 opinions
- Commonwealth v. VerdeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
- State v. CaulfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- Ken Hood Construction Co. v. Pacific Coast Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- Habrat v. MilliganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.