Legal Opinion
State v. Allen
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided March 16, 2005No. C002847CR and C011876CR A117220 (Control) and A117851PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLinder, J.
Defendant appealed three convictions for unlawful delivery and possession of a controlled substance, ORS 475.992. After defendant filed a brief pursuant to State v. Balfour, 311 Or 434, 814 P2d 1069 (1991), and ORAP 5.90, we affirmed his convictions without opinion. State v. Allen, 193 Or App 164, 90 P3d 636 (2004). Defendant now asks us to reconsider our decision, raising two arguments based on United States Supreme Court cases that were decided after his brief was filed. We grant the petition for reconsideration. On reconsideration, we affirm defendant’s convictions but vacate the sentences…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- State v. PerezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- State v. BalfourOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. GornickCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- State v. LennonOregon Supreme Court · 2010
- Markwood v. RenardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- State v. BurnsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.