People v. Crandell
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WERDEGAR, J.
The trial court imposed on defendant a restitution fine of $2,600 that had not been mentioned by the prosecutor when he recited the parties’ plea agreement. Defendant contends imposition of the fine violated his plea bargain and he therefore is entitled, pursuant to People v. Walker (1991) 54 Cal.3d 1013 [1 Cal.Rptr.2d 902, 819 P.2d 861] (Walker), to have the fine reduced to the statutory minimum of $200. (See Pen. Code, § 1202.4, subd. (b)(1); Walker, at p. 1029.) We conclude the error that occurred in Walker did not occur here. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- People v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- People v. ManchenoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- People v. McClellanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- In Re MoserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
3Cited by12 opinions
- People v. VillalobosCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
- People v. WilenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- People v. RiddlesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- People v. VillalobosCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
- The People v. CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.