People v. Wilen
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RICHMAN, J.
This appeal is by a criminal defendant from a postjudgment order directing him to pay $2,631.04. The amount is small, and the odds of collecting it problematic. But the two issues raised by the appeal are, on the surface, as important as any we can confront: (1) Does a defendant who has pleaded guilty to controlled substance crimes and who is subject of a petition for recovery of hazardous cleanup expenses have a right under Health and Safety Code section 11470.2 to have liability for those expenses decided by a jury? and (2) Does the defendant have a right to be present at…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Kentucky v. StincerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Southern Pacific Company v. JensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- People v. DoradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- People v. ChappeloneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- People v. Rocha, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- People v. FedalizoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- People v. DiSandroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Cal. Bldg. Industry Assn. v. State Water ResourcesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.