Legal Opinion
Phil Anthony Homes, Inc. v. City of Anaheim
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 13, 1959No. Civ. 6202PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MONROE, J. pro tem. *
—The petitioner and appellant brings this proceeding for a writ of mandate to compel the city of Anaheim and its city council to issue an order granting a zone variance in regard to property owned by petitioner. The property in question is in the area that is neighboring to Disneyland. The property in the immediate vicinity is occupied by motels, restaurants and a service station. Petitioner acquired the property in April of 1957, and in the following months submitted to the city planning commission its petition for a variance to permit the construction of a commercial…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Metcalf v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Rubin v. Board of DirectorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Saks & Co. v. City of Beverly HillsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Flagstad v. City of San MateoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Hopkins v. MacCullochCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gong v. City of FremontCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Grandview Baptist Church v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
- Downtown Palo Alto Committee for Fair Assessment v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- PMI Mortgage Insurance v. City of Pacific GroveCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- H. W. Rohl Co. v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.