Legal Opinion

Rubin v. Board of Directors

California Supreme Court

Decided August 23, 1940No. L. A. 17443PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

After municipal authorities had denied an application to rezone certain property, the owner successfully prosecuted a proceeding in the superior court for a writ of mandate directing the legislative body to grant a variance and exception from the zoning ordinance. The case is here upon the city’s appeal from the judgment ordering a peremptory writ to issue.

The zoning code of the city of Pasadena was adopted in 1922. It provides for variances and exceptions to be allowed by the zoning committee of the Planning Commission, and for an appeal from a determination by that body to the board of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Arverne Bay Construction Co. v. ThatcherNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  2. Drummey v. State Board of Funeral Directors & EmbalmersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  3. People Ex Rel. Fordham Manor Reformed Church v. WalshNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
  4. Hurst v. City of BurlingameCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Thayer v. Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Wilkins v. City of San BernardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Lindell Co. v. Board of Permit Appeals of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Johnston v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  4. City & Borough of Juneau v. ThibodeauAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Consolidated Rock Products Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API